Compliance

FCPA (Foreign Corrupt Practices Act)

The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, codified at 15 USC 78dd-1 et seq., is the US law that prohibits US persons and US-listed issuers from corruptly paying foreign officials to obtain or retain business, and requires public companies to maintain accurate books and adequate internal accounting controls.

The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), enacted in 1977 and codified at 15 USC 78dd-1 through 78dd-3 (anti-bribery) and 15 USC 78m(b) (accounting), is the cornerstone US anti-corruption law. It targets two separate but related forms of misconduct: directly bribing foreign officials and indirectly disguising such payments through inaccurate books or weak internal controls. For US companies operating internationally, including any company that hires contractors, agents, or distributors abroad, the FCPA is the single largest compliance risk after sanctions.

How the FCPA Works

The FCPA splits into two tracks:

  • Anti-bribery provisions (78dd-1, 78dd-2, 78dd-3). Prohibit corruptly making, offering, promising, or authorizing the payment of money or anything of value to a foreign official, foreign political party or party official, or candidate for foreign political office, for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business, directing business to any person, or securing an improper advantage. The payment can be direct or through a third party. Knowledge of a high probability that an intermediary will make a prohibited payment is sufficient mens rea.
  • Accounting provisions (78m(b)). Apply only to “issuers” (companies with securities registered under section 12 of the Exchange Act or required to file periodic reports). Issuers must keep books and records that accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets in reasonable detail, and must devise and maintain a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurances over authorization, recording, access to assets, and asset accountability.

The two tracks together cover both the bribe and the cover-up. A payment to a fixer routed through a “consulting fee” line item without supporting deliverables is both a possible anti-bribery violation and an inevitable accounting violation.

Who Must Comply

Three jurisdictional reach categories, all set out in the DOJ FCPA Resource Guide:

  • Issuers (78dd-1). Companies with US-listed securities, including foreign issuers with ADRs. Reach extends to their officers, directors, employees, agents, and stockholders acting on the company’s behalf, anywhere in the world.
  • Domestic concerns (78dd-2). US citizens, nationals, residents, and any business entity organized under US law or with its principal place of business in the US. Reach extends to officers, directors, employees, agents, and stockholders acting on the entity’s behalf, anywhere in the world.
  • Other persons (78dd-3). Foreign persons and entities that, while in the territory of the US, take any action in furtherance of a corrupt payment. DOJ has read “in the territory of the US” expansively to include emails routed through US servers, wire transfers cleared through US correspondent banks, and meetings on US soil.

Penalties

The FCPA carries both criminal and civil exposure. Penalties are adjusted for inflation under the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act.

  • Anti-bribery, criminal (per 15 USC 78ff and DOJ Justice Manual 9-47.000). Up to 2 million dollars per violation for corporations, up to 250,000 dollars and 5 years of imprisonment per violation for individuals (frequently increased under the alternative fines provision in 18 USC 3571, which permits fines up to twice the gross gain or loss).
  • Anti-bribery, civil. Up to about 25,000 dollars per violation, indexed.
  • Accounting, criminal. Up to 25 million dollars per violation for entities, up to 5 million dollars and 20 years of imprisonment per violation for individuals.
  • Accounting, civil. Disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and tiered civil penalties.
  • Collateral consequences. Debarment from US government contracts, loss of export privileges, monitorships, deferred or non-prosecution agreements, and disclosure obligations in SEC filings.

Common Pitfalls

  • Treating third parties as out of reach. A US company is liable for payments by its agents, distributors, joint-venture partners, and consultants when it knew or should have known of the corrupt nature. Due diligence on third parties is essential.
  • Disguising payments in books. Misrecording a bribe as a consulting fee, marketing expense, or commission is itself an accounting violation, regardless of whether the anti-bribery elements are proved.
  • Misclassifying state-owned enterprises. Employees of state-owned or state-controlled enterprises (national oil companies, sovereign-wealth-fund affiliates, public hospitals) are generally treated as “foreign officials” under DOJ and SEC guidance.
  • Confusing facilitating payments with grease. The exception is narrow (routine non-discretionary acts). It does not include any payment that influences a decision on whether to award business. Many countries also criminalize the same payments under local law.
  • Mishandling hospitality and gifts. Travel, meals, and gifts to foreign officials require a legitimate business purpose, reasonable cost, and accurate recording. Lavish or off-books hospitality is a textbook problem.
  • OFAC Sanctions Screening: often co-occurs with FCPA risk in the same jurisdictions and the same counterparty due diligence.
  • AML: the layered regime that catches the money-movement side of corruption.
  • KYC: the identity due-diligence backbone that flags politically exposed persons (PEPs).
  • BSA Reporting: the reporting regime that often produces the SARs that initiate FCPA investigations.

Omnivoo Contract Management builds third-party due diligence into contractor and agent onboarding, screens for politically exposed persons, retains contract and payment documentation for FCPA books-and-records compliance, and produces the audit trail DOJ and SEC investigators expect.

Frequently asked questions

When was the FCPA enacted?
The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act was signed into law on December 19, 1977 by President Jimmy Carter, after a Securities and Exchange Commission investigation found that more than 400 US companies had made questionable or illegal payments of over 300 million dollars to foreign officials for business favors. The law was amended in 1988 (codifying the facilitating-payments exception and affirmative defenses) and in 1998 (extending jurisdiction to foreign persons acting in the US).
What are the anti-bribery and accounting provisions?
The anti-bribery provisions (15 USC 78dd-1, 78dd-2, and 78dd-3) prohibit corrupt payments or offers of anything of value to a foreign official to obtain or retain business. The accounting provisions (15 USC 78m(b)) apply to issuers (companies with securities registered in the US) and require them to make and keep books, records, and accounts that accurately and fairly reflect transactions, and to maintain a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurances about transaction authorization and recording.
Who is subject to the FCPA?
Three jurisdictional categories. Issuers under 78dd-1 (US-listed companies and their officers, directors, employees, agents, and shareholders acting on their behalf, including foreign issuers with ADRs). Domestic concerns under 78dd-2 (US persons, US-incorporated entities and their officers and agents). Other persons under 78dd-3 (foreign persons and foreign entities that act in furtherance of a corrupt payment while in the territory of the United States). DOJ and SEC have asserted broad reach under each.
Who enforces the FCPA?
The Department of Justice (DOJ) enforces both the anti-bribery and accounting provisions criminally and the anti-bribery provisions civilly against domestic concerns. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) enforces both the anti-bribery and accounting provisions civilly against issuers. The two agencies often coordinate on parallel investigations, with the DOJ taking the criminal lead and the SEC the civil and disclosure-focused lead.
Does the FCPA have a facilitating payments exception?
Yes, but it is narrow and not commonly available. The 1988 amendments added an exception for facilitating or expediting payments to a foreign official, political party, or party official the purpose of which is to expedite or to secure the performance of a routine governmental action. Examples include obtaining permits or licenses to qualify for business, processing visas or work permits, and providing police protection. The exception does not cover any decision by a foreign official whether or what business to award.

Related articles

Omnivoo handles this for you

Stop worrying about Indian payroll and compliance terms. Omnivoo manages everything (PF, ESI, TDS, professional tax, and more) across all 28 states.

Get started